Djokovic beats Delpo in thriller

Published by AP

Novak Djokovic (R) and Juan Martin del Potro embrace after Djokovic's three-set victory in Acapulco, taking the Serb's lead in their head-to-head to 11-4; Getty Images
Novak Djokovic turned the tables on Olympic conqueror Juan Martin del Potro to set up a mouthwatering quarterfinal with Nick Kyrgios in Acapulco.

Novak Djokovic rallied to beat Argentinian Juan Martin del Potro 4-6 6-4 6-4 early on Thursday to advance to the Mexican Open quarterfinals.

Djokovic, playing in his first tournament since his shocking loss in the second round of the Australian Open, struggled to beat Del Potro, the 2009 US Open winner, who ousted the Serbian 7-6(4) 7-6(2) in the first round of the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.

It was the first match between them since.

“Every time you play against Delpo, there’s a lot of tension, emotions and quality of play,” Djokovic said. “I’m happy I was able to beat him this time.”

The 29-year-old Serbian, ranked No. 2, suffered an unexpected loss to Uzbekistan’s Denis Istomin on the Australian Open.

Djokovic, making his debut in Acapulco, was losing 4-3 in the third set, but he broke Del Potro twice and was able to preserve his serve to get the victory.

The Serbian star will play against Australian Nick Kyrgios, who advanced with a 6-2 6-4 victory over American Donald Young.

Share this: 
  • Most popular articles

9 January 2018

ATP: the biggest strength and weakness of every top 10 playe...

As the first Grand Slam of the season fast approaches, top-10 players are leading the char... More

22 February 2016

Quiz: How well do you know the rules of tennis?

How well do you know your lobs from your lets? Take this test to see if you can be the nex... More

17 August 2017

The female serve: an exploration

Alicia Molik, a former top 10 star who owned one of the sport’s best serves, believes se... More

26 August 2019

Remembering 1999, one of tennis’ greatest seasons

Was 1999 the most memorable season in tennis?Recency bias may lead people to disagree, but... More