The GIG: Analysing Pliskova’s upset of Serena

Published by Stephanie Kovalchik

Karolina Pliskova had only a 13% chance of winning going into the match. Photo: Getty Images

Karolina Pliskova sprung one of the upsets of the year when she downed Serena Williams in straight sets in Thursday’s US Open semifinal. Going in to the match Pliskova had just a 13% win probability, so how and when did she turn this around? Stephanie Kovalchik from Tennis Australia’s Game Insight Group (GIG) crunched the numbers to analyse the key turning points in the match.

This article first appeared on on-the-t.com. To read Steph’s analysis of Kerber v Wozniacki click here.

On Day 11, only Karolina Pliskova stood in the way of Serena Williams road to what has seemed like an inevitable 23rd Major victory. Pre-match predictions for the match were giving Pliskova just a 13% chance of pulling out an upset. But after Pliskova’s thrashing of Ana Konjuh, even Williams had to have some doubt about the semifinal outcome.

The first turning point and sign of things to come came in the first set and third game, when Pliskova was the first to break serve. That break added ten percentage points to Pliskova’s win chances. The next critical moment was in the fifth game when Pliskova created another break chance but failed to convert. Holding her serve, she kept on the attack in the seventh, breaking Williams at love. The set was in Pliskova’s hands at that point and her win chances for the match were at a high of 40%.

Pliskova's win probability over Williams.

Looking at the point-to-point win chances for Pliskova, it is really interesting to see that, although there is a gradual increase in her favor (especially over the first set), there were only a few occasions when she was in a dominant position, probabilistically. Even after winning the first set, her chances of winning the match hovered between 40-45% for most of the second. Watching the match, it was clear that Pliskova had the upperhand and was perhaps helped by a not entirely healthy Williams. Still, Williams overall win record gave her good chances of turning things around up until the very end.

The match might have gone very differently if Pliskova had been able to hold her serve after winning the first break in the fifth game of the second set. After that, both players save break points to stay on serve and force a tiebreak to decide the set and, possibly, match.

At the first point of the tiebreak, the win chances were dead even. Pliskova took the early advantage with the first point meaning break, at that point her win chances soared to 61%, and, after holding her next 2 service points, hit a match-high of 78%. But Williams wasn’t going to let the match slip away that easily. She won the next 4 points and dropped Pliskova’s upset prospects back to 40%. Pliskova had to act quickly and dig deep to get another mini-break to square her chances again. With both players back on serve, it would be the first to get the next break that could take the whole thing. In the end, it was Pliskova who turned her nose at the odds and beat Williams to the win.

To read Steph’s analysis of the other semifinal click here.

Share this: 
  • Most popular articles

29 April 2016

How to beat a better player

Victory was never out of the question when Bernard Tomic faced 17-time Grand Slam champion... More

7 November 2016

20 Questions: Andy Murray

Double Wimbledon champion, double Olympic champion and now world No.1. But what doesn't An... More

14 November 2017

Test! Which ATP finalist are you?

Which 2017 ATP finalist are you? Take the test to find out!Quiz! Are you a WTA Finals supe... More

31 May 2016

Quiz: Can you name the player in the shadows?

You know their faces on the court, but can you name them when they're in the shadows? We s... More